If an employee views a confidential file contrary to clear and reasonable policy, she can be fired for cause. That was the judgment of the BC Supreme Court in Steel v. Coast Capital Savings Credit Union 2013 BCSC 527. The Plaintiff, Ms. Steel, was a help desk analyst in the IT department of the Defendant… → Read More
Breach of Confidentiality May be Cause
Credit Union's Clear Policy Helpful
Posted in Discipline, Just Cause, Privacy, TerminationPensions: The Basics
DB versus DC
Posted in Benefits, Compensation, PensionsOur colleague Mark Firman from our Toronto office has recently posted a couple of short pieces to help sort out the differences and pros and cons between defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans. These are good reads for anyone thinking about setting up, reviewing or changing pension plans. Look here to see Part I… → Read More
“Workplace Investigations – Part 3”
Posted in Discipline, Discrimination, Human Rights, Investigations, Just Cause, Termination, Workers Compensation, Wrongful DismissalIn earlier posts, here and here, we discussed some legal issues that arise in workplace investigations. In this post, we will discuss some of the privacy issues that can arise. The investigator is often asked by nervous employees whether their identity and the information they give will be kept confidential. This cannot be guaranteed. Employees being… → Read More
Workplace Investigations – Part 2
Posted in Damages, Discipline, Human Rights, Investigations, Just Cause, Termination, Workers Compensation, Wrongful DismissalIn an earlier post, we discussed when employers may wish to conduct workplace investigations. In this post we’ll discuss who should conduct the investigation. Being lawyers, we usually have a quick answer to this: legal counsel. We recognize, however, that clients don’t have unlimited funds. So practically speaking, each situation will have to be assessed… → Read More
Workplace Investigations – Part 1
Posted in Damages, Investigations, Just Cause, Termination, Wrongful DismissalWith the complexity of workplace law and issues, employers are subject to an increasing number of workplace obligations. When a workplace incident arises it’s often required, or at least advisable, that an employer conduct a prompt and thorough investigation. In this and subsequent posts, we will review some key legal issues that arise in conducting… → Read More
BC Human Rights Tribunal Awards Costs Against Complainant
Posted in Discrimination, Human Rights, LitigationEmployers are often frustrated by the fact that the BC Human Rights Tribunal rarely awards costs, even when an employee or former employee brings a frivolous complaint. In Edwards v. Schnitzer Steel Pacific, the Tribunal accepted the employer’s submissions that the complainant should pay costs for resiling from a settlement agreement. Edwards agreed to settle his complaint… → Read More
Hybrid Pension Plans Not the Best Answer
Time to Consider Target Benefit Plans
Posted in Benefits, Compensation, PensionsOne of the key elements of the new collective agreements recently reached by the Canadian Auto Workers with Ford, GM and Chrysler is a “hybrid” pension plan for new employees. It has both “defined benefit” (DB) and “defined contribution” (DC) components. This hybrid solution follows a similar arrangement between Air Canada and the CAW reached in September 2011…. → Read More
Restrictive Covenants Part III: Enforcement
Posted in Employee Obligations, Litigation, TerminationIn earlier posts, we discussed some considerations in drafting restrictive covenants. Today we’ll talk about trying to enforce them. So your employee has left and you hear he is working for a competitor. He has a non-compete. Your lawyer sends a cease and desist letter and gets a response from another lawyer. Perhaps the response will… → Read More
Less is More: Restrictive Covenants Part II
Posted in Employee Obligations, Litigation, TerminationAs noted in our previous post, courts will not enforce a restrictive covenant against a departing employee unless the former employer can show the restraints imposed are reasonable between the parties and in reference to the public interest. So consider, 1. Is there a legitimate business interest being protected? 2. Is the restraint imposed reasonable, and… → Read More
The ties that bind (or not)…Restrictive Covenants, Part I
Posted in Employee Obligations, Litigation, TerminationThe start of an employment relationship is, in some respects, like the start of a romantic relationship. Seasoned executives become giddy with the prospect of a new love, er, recruit. “He/she is perfect! I want him/her to start tomorrow!” they say to their employment lawyer. To which we say (among other things): “Do you want the… → Read More
Privacy Commissioner investigates Criminal Records Checks
Posted in Human Capital, Privacy, RecruitingOn July 25, 2012 the British Columbia Information and Privacy Commissioner released an investigation report regarding the use of employment related criminal record checks by the Government of British Columbia. The Commissioner concluded that the Government’s current policy with respect to criminal records checks contravenes the Freedom of Information and Protect of Privacy Act as, among… → Read More
Frustration – Part 2
Posted in Discrimination, Employee Obligations, Human Rights, TerminationIn an earlier post here, we spoke about the possibility of alleging frustration of contract when an employee is absent for a lengthy period due to illness or disability. The doctrine was also recently relied upon outside the disability context to terminate an employee whose criminal conviction prevented him from obtaining the necessary license to… → Read More
Frustration of Contract – Part 1
Posted in Discrimination, Employee Obligations, Human Rights, TerminationIn earlier posts here and here, we discussed attendance management policies. When an employee is absent for a sufficiently lengthy period, an employer may eventually rely upon the legal doctrine of “frustration”, and terminate employment. (A similar concept for union employees is known as “innocent absenteeism”.) The doctrine of frustration of contract operates as a complete… → Read More
Pay for No Work – Part II – Travel Time
Posted in Employment Standards, Wage and HoursAn earlier post looked at having to pay for on-call time under the Employment Standards Act (British Columbia). This post looks at travel time. Travel time may be payable, depending on whether the travel is at the direction of the employer. Commuting from home to work and back again is generally not payable, even if… → Read More
Pay for No Work – Part I – On-Call
Posted in Employment Standards, Wage and HoursIn addition to vacations and statutory holidays, there are two key times when an employee who is not performing any productive work may be entitled to be paid under the Employment Standards Act (British Columbia): while on-call other than at home; and during travel time. On-call employees are “at work” and are entitled to be… → Read More
Deduction of Pension Benefits from Wrongful Dismissal Damages
Posted in Benefits, Compensation, Pensions, Damages, Termination, Wrongful DismissalIn Waterman v. IBM Canada [2011] S.C.C.A. No. 427 (QL), the Supreme Court of Canada has granted to leave to appeal from a decision of the BC Court of Appeal deciding that pension benefits are not deductible from wrongful dismissal damages. The Plaintiff Waterman was terminated without cause by IBM after approximately 42 years of service. … → Read More
The Overtime Trap – Part II
Posted in Benefits, Compensation, Pensions, Employment Standards, Wage and HoursManagers “Managers” are exempt from the overtime provisions of the Employment Standards Act (British Columbia). But, beware of the narrow definition, and the potential for overtime claims at straight time. Not everyone called or considered a manager in the workplace is exempt. Only those who are employed in an executive capacity, or whose principal responsibilities are… → Read More
Suggesting Decertification Just Might Work
Posted in Labour Relations, UnionsWhat unionized employer hasn’t wished they could ask their employees to decertify? Most employers know that initiating and advocating in favour of a decertification application is considered improper interference. But what if your company is facing financial ruin and you have nothing to lose? In this case, the employer was facing severe financial challenges and… → Read More
The Overtime Trap – Part I
Posted in Benefits, Compensation, Pensions, Employment Standards, Wage and HoursThe Employment Standards Act (British Columbia) requires that an employer pay an employee overtime wages if it “requires, or directly or indirectly allows, the employee to work more than 8 hours a day or 40 hours a week.” An employee who can provide some evidence of starting early, staying late, working through lunch or doing work… → Read More
Collective Agreements and Employment Standards
Posted in Employment Standards, UnionsEmployers with unionized employees must understand if and when the Employment Standards Act (British Columbia) will apply. Collective Agreement Prevails A collective agreement may have provisions that fall below the minimum requirements of the Act in the following areas: hours of work and overtime (Part 4), statutory holidays (Part 5), annual vacation and vacation pay… → Read More
Claim for Damages for Breach of Privacy
Posted in Discipline, Family Status, Litigation, PrivacyThe Ontario Court of Appeal has created a new cause of action. It is now possible to sue for damages for a breach of privacy. Tsige and Jones were employees at different branches of the Bank of Montreal. They did not know each other, but Tsige had a relationship with Jones’s ex-husband. Tsige looked at… → Read More